History shows us exhaustively the same episodes, however, in different times and characters. Art seems to always be ahead of the very time it is created. Maybe the creation of, and the understanding of art won't coexist among the majorities.

I often hear rumors that there are no artists as there used to be, that modern technology replaced the artist, and there is nothing that requires talent. The right question to this moment is: If it is true, why is there so much distinction among the works of art? Wouldn't it be logical that anyone could do the same job with the same excellence?I believe in art. I believe in those that look forward trying to capture the essence of things.

I believe that art is constantly becoming new and that each era has its own artists and those artist use every available tool to manifest their art.

Ramon Zancanaro - Creation Director at FrameOne

Should I be limited to coal and paper to be considered an artist? After all the ruler cuts the way of straight lines, as well as the compass does to circles and ink with the filling.

Artist is the person that extracts from its tools, something with a higher esthetic degree than others. It isn't hard to be art, slow or painful, being is enough. The talent lies inside people, not inside tools.